简介：

简介：　　It's the end of the academic year at the Hénin-Beaumont high school. Between two TikTok videos and their science lessons, best friends Linda and Irina confide in each other about their families and their future. But Linda is going to have to move in the coming year. What will remain of their friendship? The marvellous story of a bygone summer.

简介：　　瑞士导演贝蒂娜·奥波利执导新片[转向风](Le Vent Tourne，暂译)将于8月7日开拍。该片由梅兰妮·蒂埃里([舞女])、皮埃尔·德隆尚([湖畔的陌生人])、努诺·洛佩斯([圣乔治])主演。故事讲述一对夫妻，几年前接手了家中的农场，他们决心不惜一切代价保住土地。却因此使得两人的关系愈加不稳定。

简介：Ralph Burton is a miner who is trapped for several days as a result of a cave-in. When he finally manages to dig himself out, he realizes that all of mankind seems to have been destroyed in a nuclear holocaust. He travels to New York City only to find it deserted. Making a life for himself there, he is flabbergasted to eventually find Sarah Crandall, who also managed to survive. Together, they form a close friendship until the arrival of Benson Thacker who has managed to pilot his small boat into the city's harbor. At this point the tensions rise between the three, particularly between Thacker, who is white and Burton, who is black.

简介：Each night in Paris, hundreds of men and women anonymously use telephone lines that date from the German Occupation and are no longer listed to talk to each other, to love each other. These people, shipwrecked lovers, are dying to love, to escape the abyss of solitude...

简介：　　Elodie and Laetitia live in close love and dream of having a child. As Elodie discovers that she cannot get pregnant because of a health problem and encounters financial troubles, they decide to take a roommate.

简介：中年的弗朗索瓦（布鲁诺·克雷默）是名哲学老师，他和风度怡人的妻在小镇里过着中规中距的生活。然而他的学生，17岁的少女玛蒂尔（凡妮莎·帕拉迪丝）出现了，带着少年人少有的成熟和不羁。　　弗朗索瓦带着挽救堕落少女的心情走近她，却难以抑制的被玛蒂尔的热情和聪慧所吸引。他们相爱了，激情四溢，刻骨铭心。可是当玛蒂尔要求弗朗索瓦离开妻，与她一起时，男人退缩了，他想到了年龄，婚姻，道德，身份，想到了太多的琐碎。　　再次绝望的玛蒂尔用激烈的方式破坏老师的生活，颠覆了他的事业与婚姻，然后消失的无影无踪。当人们再次发现她的时候，她的房间里写着“弗朗索瓦，这里就是海。”

简介：　　1928年的法国朗德省，美丽而桀骜的泰芮丝·拉霍克（奥黛丽·塔图 Audrey Tautou 饰）嫁给了好友安·德吉侯（阿奈丝·德穆斯捷 Anaïs Demoustier 饰）的哥哥贝纳（吉尔·勒卢什 Gilles Lellouche 饰）。她平静的外表下内心狂如野马，曾经渴望婚姻能够平息心头的风暴，反却陷入更深的寂寞与抑郁之中。安喜欢上了一个有着家族病的青年尚·阿齐维多（斯坦利·韦伯 Stanley Weber 饰），但遭到家族的极力反对，或许只有带着复杂情感的泰芮丝情愿为她从中周旋。泰芮丝的眼神愈来愈冷，语锋愈来愈烈，早已对看似荣华实则死气沉沉的婚姻绝望的她，信步朝着万劫不复的深渊走去……
　　影片根据诺贝尔文学奖得主弗朗索瓦·莫里亚克取材自真实事件创作的同名小说改编。

简介：　　表面上看来，克里斯汀（克里斯汀·斯科特·托马斯 Kristin Scott Thomas 饰）和伊莎贝尔（露德温·塞尼耶 Ludivine Sagnier 饰）之间的关系简直就是上司与下属之间关系的典范，可实际上，在两人之间，深深的嫌隙早已经生根发芽。
　　对于克里斯汀来说，伊莎贝尔的才华就是自己的摇钱树，通过一系列不道德的手段，克里斯汀利用伊莎贝尔为自己谋得了巨大的利益。而对于伊莎贝尔来说，上司的蛮横和强势始终压迫着她令她无法翻身，每天忍气吞声的生活似乎没有尽头。被压抑的矛盾总有爆发的一天，为了报复克里斯汀，伊莎贝尔策划了一场缜密的谋杀。伊莎贝尔真的能下得了如此狠手吗？她的计划又能否成功呢？

简介：以绝对遵循教条、荣誉和服从为原则的某法国驻东非殖民地志愿兵团，迎来一批新兵，其中最突出的当属有着英俊相貌和威猛身材的桑泰恩（格利哥力•格林），他同时吸引司令官布鲁诺（米修•苏宝尔）和中尉布格罗普（丹尼斯•拉凡）投来灼热渴慕的目光。　　在接触中，桑泰恩与布鲁诺渐渐表现出暧昧的同性爱意，这引起布格罗普的不快，继而生出混杂了多种情感的嫉妒，最终，他设下圈套，迫使桑泰恩离开兵团，但他自己也因此结束了志愿军生涯。

简介：　　1979年夏天，巴黎。Anne是个风光不再的同性恋色情片制片人。她的剪辑师兼爱人Loïs离她而去。她决定与密友Archibald共同拍摄一部更有野心的新片，以重新赢回前女友的心。但她的其中一名演员却被野蛮谋杀，Anne的生活也被这场奇怪的调查所扰乱。

简介：During a long awaited family soiree Cedric challenges his relatives why they keep him from his journey.

简介：两位女演员（夏洛特·甘斯布、碧翠斯·黛尔）讲述女巫的故事。

简介：　　内向的波兰裔青年塔尔科夫斯基（罗曼·波兰斯基 Roman Polanski 饰）独自来到巴黎，希望在此租住一间公寓。这间房之前的房客西蒙·肖（Romain Bouteille 饰）不知出于何种原因跳楼自杀。在西蒙于医院中气绝身亡后，塔尔科夫斯基顺利地成为了新的房客。
　　乔迁之喜并未给他带来太多欢乐，周遭的压抑气氛无时无刻不在侵扰他的神经。这桩古老的公寓中住着许多古板沉闷的人，他们抱怨塔尔科夫斯基制造过多的噪音、联名排挤其他房客……这个可怜的青年虽然小心应对，却渐渐被他们逼向绝境。塔尔科夫斯基开始意识到西蒙·肖自杀的原因，他同时发现，自己也正被这群怪房客引向毁灭的终点……

简介：

简介：　　改编自法国著名的童书，此前这部书就已经多次被拍成电视剧和电影。故事发生在二战期间的阿尔卑斯山脚下的小镇上，讲述了小男孩塞巴斯蒂安驯化灵犬雪莉的故事。这里位于法国和西班牙交界，大地被皑皑白雪，一切都那么宁静祥和，直到纳粹士兵的到来。在小镇上有一只叫 做雪莉的小白狗和叫做塞巴斯蒂安的小男孩，他们出生在同一天。这两个初生时互不相关的小生命，在无形命运的拉扯下，几年后被紧紧的连繫在一起，成了彼此相知并深深相惜的好伙伴。这是一次永恒友谊的历险，也是一个足智多谋而又令人感动孩子不平凡的故事。这是一个小男孩寻找母亲、一位老人追寻过往、一个抵抗战士寻找爱情、一位年轻女子寻觅奇遇、一个德国军官寻求宽恕的离奇旅程。这是灵犬雪莉与塞巴斯蒂安的生活..

简介：十七岁的达米安（卡西·莫泰·克莱恩 Kacey Mottet Klein 饰）是一名孤独的少年，他的父亲内森（亚历谢斯·罗莱特 Alexis Loret 饰）由于工作的原因常年不在家，父子两人聚少离多。达米安自小和母亲玛丽安（桑德利那·吉贝尔兰 Sandrine Kiberlain 饰）过着相依为命的生活，个性难免变得怯懦而阴柔，为此遭到了不少的欺凌和嘲笑。　　某日，达米安结识了一位名叫托马斯（科伦汀·菲拉 Corentin Fila 饰）的少年，两人刚一见面就相互看不顺眼，势同水火。可是，让达米安没有想到的是，母亲竟然收养了无人照顾的托马斯，两人竟成为了住在同一屋檐下的兄弟。随着时间的推移，达米安和托马斯，两颗孤寂的灵魂之间产生了特殊的羁绊。

简介：　　弗朗索瓦·克鲁塞([触不可及])加盟新片[红项圈](Le Collier rouge，暂译)。电影由让·贝克([与玛格丽特的午后])执导。故事发生在1919年的一个小镇，一位战争英雄被囚禁在废弃的兵营里，而一个受过良好教育的年轻妇女则沦为农民，她受够了土地上的工作。这一 切都将由一位法官来处理。
　　改编自法国作家让-克利斯托夫•吕芬的中篇小说《红项圈》。

简介：Voice 1 (male professional announcer type) This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.　　These people also scorned subjective profundity. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.　　Voice 2 (Debord, monotone) Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.　　Voice 1 They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.　　Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.　　The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.　　Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.　　The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole ” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.　　This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.　　The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...　　Voice 2 Our life is a journey ” In the winter and the night. ” We seek our passage...�　　Voice 1 The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.　　Voice 2 There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.　　On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.　　Voice 3 (young girl) No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.　　Voice 1 The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.　　Voice 2 One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.　　Voice 1 When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment ordinary life� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.　　The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant nuns.　　What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.　　Voice 2 The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.　　Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.　　Voice 3 The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.　　Voice 1 In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.　　Voice 2 Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.　　Voice 1 What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.　　Voice 2 The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept　　Voice 3 What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.　　Voice 2 Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.　　Voice 1 Really hard to drink more.　　Voice 2 Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation ” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.　　Voice 3 There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.　　Voice 2 In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.　　The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.　　To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point　　Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.　　1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

简介：罗丹（杰拉尔•德帕迪约 Gérard Depardieu  饰）是一个名满世界的雕塑家，众所周知的“思想者”就是他的作品。实际上，除了他自己的艺术天才外，还有一个人在罗丹的艺术和感情生命中有举足轻重的地位，那就是他的情人卡蜜尔（伊莎贝尔•阿佳妮 Isabelle Adjani饰） 。卡蜜尔也是一位极具艺术天份的美少女，与罗丹忘年相恋。但是，大凡和大师的恋情总是充满折磨和坎坷一样，卡蜜尔也一样。他们之间疯狂而充满激情的爱情，会带给卡蜜尔怎样的命运呢？

简介：弗朗西斯（加德·艾尔马莱 Gad Elmaleh 饰）是一个代客泊车的泊车小弟，善良的他虽然默默无闻，但心中亦有自己的理想和希望。可惜这理想抛弃了他，女友残酷拒绝了他的结婚请求。失意的男人走在街上，身边是一对男女在大声争执。女的名叫伊莲娜（阿丽斯·塔格里奥妮 Alice Taglioni 饰），男的则是知名政客。此时的弗朗西斯不会知道，在某个记者按下快门的那一瞬间，他的生活将会发生翻天覆地的变化。　　第二天，杂志上的大幅照片引起了轰动。原来，伊莲娜是政客的情人，而为了摆脱和伊莲娜的关系，政客无奈之下只得把刚好经过的弗朗西斯拉上了贼船，让弗朗西斯成为了自己的替罪羊。就这样，弗朗西斯莫名其妙的开始了和伊莲娜的同居生活，面对冷艳高贵的伊莲娜，弗朗西斯会闹出怎样的笑话？

简介：

　　佩威尔是一个30来岁的男人，他和父亲齐格蒙特一起做着从法国北部贩卖二手服装到波兰的生意过活。
　　在一次从平常的“公差”的回程的路上，佩威尔看到自己父亲的照片被印在了波兰当地的小报纸上，名字下面写着“叛国贼”。齐格蒙特当年是一个天才般的反对派领袖，曾经在80年代组织过对独裁ZF的反对行动。可是现在，他的头像和名字却被冠以了叛国者的名字，而且那张有意境垮台的共产主义者掌权的小报还报道说，齐格蒙特是一个可耻的告密者，代号叫做“鼹鼠”。
　　在今天的波兰，虽然有着20年的民主化进程，但是齐格蒙特的故事还是引起了不小的波澜。报道指出，齐格蒙特当年领导的运动害死了不少矿主，而他的老婆伊娃的父亲，就死在当年的运动中。佩威尔坚信这是反对他父亲的人的无中生有之事，但是齐格蒙特很多反常的举动让佩威尔不得不对自己父亲的过去产生很多疑虑。事情波及到了这一家人，齐格蒙特前往法国北部，找到自己的堂兄，希望事情能“风平浪静”。
　　佩威尔的生活被搅得天翻地覆。他平时是一个对政治不感兴趣的人，可是这次他却成为了众矢之的，变成了一个国家的政治争论的焦点。齐格蒙特还呆在法国北部，而波兰确认为是佩威尔把父亲藏匿了起来，他与母亲伊娃的关系也不可避免地受到了影响。
　　加贝克，当年【该用户发言已被安全软件自动屏蔽】的秘密警察，也参与了反对行动。他知道齐格蒙特在当年做了什么，可是他不愿意开口，因为这些事情无论对于齐格蒙特、佩威尔还是波兰这个命运多舛的国家来说，都是难以接受的。
　　Pawel, a young man who grew up thinking that his father was a hero of the Solidarity revolt of the 1980s, is shocked to read a newspaper exposé accusing the man of having been a Communist informer. Pawel's wife happens to be the daughter of a miner killed during the Solidarity protests and his marriage suffers. He doesn't know whom to believe. A former Communist secret policeman may have some answers, but will anyone listen?

简介：　　对于依旧单身的茹贝尔先生（法布莱斯·鲁奇尼 Fabrice Luchini 饰）来说，他古板的个性和所从事的那份股票经纪人的无趣职业十分的相配，与此相反的是，这样的他居然爱上了和自己完全不在同一个生活圈的女佣玛利亚（娜塔丽娅·沃拜克 Natalia Verbeke 饰）。
　　通过玛利亚，茹贝尔认识了许多和玛利亚一样的，生活在社会底层却依旧对生活充满了希望与热情的女人们，她们的积极乐观不仅感动了茹贝尔，也撼动了他观念中坚守多年的种种繁文缛节。而当爱情最初的热度退却之后，诸多的问题渐渐显现。爱情的力量究竟能不能改变一个人，而这样一段发生在两个性格相去甚远的成年人之间的感情又能否得到众人的祝福呢？

简介：　　杰夫（阿兰·德龙 Alain Delon 饰）是一名沉默寡言的杀手，他住在一间旅馆里，仅与一只鸟为伴。独来独往的他接到委托暗杀俱乐部的老板，尽管行动天衣无缝，但警察还是扣押了他。钢琴女马蕾莉（凯茜·罗齐尔 Cathy Rosier 饰）认出了杰夫就是当天的可疑男子，但她却选择了包庇杰夫，这使杰夫心生疑虑。杰夫找到中间人结算工钱，没想到中间人开枪打伤了他。逃过一劫的杰夫暗中查明了雇主的身份，找到并且杀死了他，但同时，他发现，当初袒护他的马蕾莉，居然是雇主的情人。心情复杂的杰夫举着手枪来到俱乐部质问马蕾莉，却被早已埋伏在此的警察乱枪打死，事后，警察们发现，杰夫的手枪中并没有子弹，他这一行为的意义也成为了一个永远的秘密。